Sunday, October 26, 2008

Still to Explore in Bretton woods system ...

Development of the system ... Are they working or not in crisis ...

The international economic situation

After World War I most countries wanted to return to the old financial security and stable situation of pre-war times as soon as possible. Discussions about a return to the gold standard began and by 1926 all leading economies had re-established the system, according to which every nation’s circulating money had to be backed by reserves of gold and foreign currencies to a certain extent. But several mistakes in implementing the gold standard (mainly
that a weakened Great Britain had to take the leading part and that a number of main currencies where over- or undervalued) led to a collapse of the economic and financial relations, peaking in the Great Depression in 1929. Every single country tried to increase the competitiveness of its export products in order to reduce its payment balance deficit by deflating its currency. This strategy only led to success as long as a country was deflating faster and more strongly than all other nations. This fact resulted in an international deflation competition that caused mass unemployment, bankruptcy of enterprises, the failing of credit institutions, as well as hyper inflations in the countries concerned.

In the 1930s several conferences dealing with the world monetary problems caused by the
Great Depression had ended in failure. But after World War II the need for a stabilizing system that avoided the mistakes, which had been made earlier, became evident. Plans were made for an innovative monetary system and a supervising institution to monitor all actions.
First negotiations took place under wartime conditions.

Conference of Bretton Woods

In 1944 an international conference took place in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire (USA). 44 countries attended this conference in order to restructure international finance and currency relationships. The participants of this conference created the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD/World Bank).

Additionally, they agreed on implementing a system of fixed exchange rates with the U.S. dollar as the key currency.

The plans for the system of Bretton Woods were developed by two important economists of these days, the American minister of state in the U.S. treasury, Harry Dexter White, and the British economist John Maynard Keynes who stated: “ We, the delegates of this Conference, Mr President, have been trying to accomplish something very difficult to accomplish.[...] It has been our task to find a common measure, a common standard, a common rule acceptable to each and not irksome to any.” This statement outlines the difficulty of creating a system that every nation could accept. The ideas of John Maynard Keynes and Harry Dexter White have been described as very different from each other on several occasions but in fact there are extraordinary similarities. According to the White plan, a Bank for Reconstruction (today the World Bank) and an International Stabilisation Fund should be established. The Keynes plan called for the same. The only difference was that Keynes wanted to vest the IMF with possibilities to create money (a fact that can easily be understood in the background of Great Britain’s suffering from the deflation policies in the Inter-War period) and with the authority
to take actions on a much larger scale. In case of balance of payments imbalances John Maynard Keynes recommended that both sides, debtors and creditors, should change their policies. Countries with payment surpluses should increase their imports from the deficit countries and thereby create a foreign trade equilibrium. Harry Dexter White, on the other hand, saw an imbalance as a problem only of the deficit country. Economists today agree that White was mistaken and Keynes was more farsighted. However, Keynes’ plan was never discussed seriously at Bretton Woods and the participants agreed on the White plan. The United States defined the value of its dollar in terms of gold, so that one ounce of gold was equal to $ 35. All other members had to define the value of their money according to what was called the “par value system” in terms of U.S. dollars or gold.

The dominant role of the USA

The USA has been and still is the dominating power of the Bretton Woods system. After World War II the United States was the country with the biggest economic potential. The U.S. dollar was the currency with the most purchasing power and it was the only currency that was backed by gold. Additionally, all European nations that had been involved in World War II were highly in debt and transferred large amounts of gold into the United States, a fact that
contributed to the supremacy of the USA. Thus, the U.S. dollar was strongly appreciated in the rest of the world and therefore became the key currency of the Bretton Woods system. The headquarters of the two main institutions (the IMF and the World Bank) are situated in Washington D.C. The dominant role of the USA already became apparent when the American ideas of the Bretton Woods system gained more acceptance than those of Great Britain. The plans of the British economist John Maynard Keynes were rejected and the model of the American economist White was favoured. Despite “Keynes’s part in constructing the Bretton Woods system, his vain struggle, over five wartime missions to Washington, to preserve Britain’s financial independence from the United States” the Bretton Woods system is dominated by the USA.

Regards,
ADJ

Friday, October 24, 2008

Micro economy or macro economy ...

Yes, It is valid comment karthick, that micro economy is not taken duly care. that only made this kind financial crisis. But your point on lending process, lending process in economy occupy a important place. Vital part of finance made this much time to give us ripple effects to your finance world.

Regards,
ADJ

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Starts at Great Economic Depression

Models and system created after economic slow down in various countries, in the name stablizing economy, we only created complex structure to hidden some countries real face.
Let us explore more in the bretton woods system.

Friday, October 3, 2008

Still to Explore in Finance


Let us explore Modern world of Finance - Leads to Crisis situation now …

Complex models lead financial crisis today ? ? ?


This is main topic for this month 17th October 2008 to 17th November ௨00௮
- Let us join hands to contribute things in this area ...

In times of globalisation the economic environment changes rapidly. Capital movements
become larger and at the same time less controllable. Therefore, the need for a stabilising system becomes more and more apparent. In the past such a system has been established at the conference of Bretton Woods. Already in 1944 the British economist John Maynard Keynes emphasised “the importance of rule-based regimes to stabilise business expectationssomething he accepted in the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchanged rates.”1 Recently leading industrial nations have been calling for a renewal of the purpose and the spirit of this system in order to cope with the growing size of international trade and capital flows. This essay gives a short overview of the system’s development from 1944 until today and stresses especially problems and obstacles. It identifies mistakes that have been made and points out aspects that have to be taken into account when implementing a “new system of Bretton
Woods”.
Source: Sabine Dammasch
Regards,
ADJ